Guide · Public Bodies

PHSO complaints

Escalating eligible complaints about UK government departments or the NHS in England.

A PHSO complaint should explain what the public body or NHS organisation did wrong, why that amounts to poor administration/service, the injustice caused and what would put it right.

PHSO is the final stage, so include the organisation’s final complaint response and show why it did not resolve the issue. Its Principles provide a useful framework for evaluating administration, complaint handling and remedy.

For UK government-department complaints, remember the MP referral requirement.

Key points

  • Complete the organisation complaint process.
  • Use the correct NHS/government referral route.
  • Explain fault and injustice.
  • Use PHSO Principles where they illuminate the administrative failure.

A useful complaint structure

What happenedShort chronology
What should have happenedLaw, policy, published standard or good administration
What went wrongSpecific maladministration/service failure
InjusticeEffect on you
RemedyWhat should now happen

Reasons and records

PHSO principles expressly emphasise clear reasons, proper information handling and reliable records. If those are central to the complaint, identify the missing/inconsistent record and why it matters to the decision.

Remedy should match injustice

Where possible, ask to be restored to the position absent the fault. If that cannot be achieved, explain what practical/financial remedy would fairly recognise the impact.

NHS and UK-government complaints reach PHSO differently

PHSO is normally the final stage after the organisation has had a chance to respond. NHS complaints in England can be taken to PHSO directly once the local route is exhausted. Complaints about UK government departments and certain other public organisations are subject to the statutory “MP filter”: the complaint must be referred through a Member of Parliament. PHSO says complaints should usually reach it within a year of the person becoming aware of the problem, although it has some discretion where there are good reasons for delay.

Show injustice, not just administrative fault

Explain what the alleged maladministration or service failure caused: worsening health impact, avoidable cost, lost opportunity, uncertainty, distress, delay or another practical consequence. Then state what would put matters right. This helps PHSO assess both whether an investigation is warranted and what remedy would be proportionate.

In practice

  • Do not simply attach the entire internal complaint file; give PHSO a map.
  • Quote the final response on each disputed issue.
  • Protect the statutory time limit.

Evidence worth keeping

Complaint to the NHS body or government organisation
Final complaint response
Relevant clinical/administrative records
Short chronology
Evidence of impact/injustice
PHSO submission and correspondence

Challenge a final response by issue, not emotion.

Submission structure.

1. Jurisdiction and local-process status. 2. Numbered issues. 3. Key chronology. 4. Evidence references. 5. Injustice. 6. Remedy. 7. Any urgent vulnerability/access needs.

For central-government complaints, obtain the MP referral early enough that the procedural filter does not become the reason a timely complaint is lost.

Translate the history into maladministration/service failure.

State the standard, what happened, evidence and injustice. Avoid making the Ombudsman reconstruct a five-year correspondence chain. If the issue is clinical, identify the disputed clinical decision separately from complaint-handling and administrative failures.

Finish the local complaint, or document why it has become unreasonable to wait.

PHSO expects the organisation to have had an opportunity to respond. Its NHS guidance also recognises situations where the complaint has not been dealt with after six months. Keep acknowledgements, agreed timescales and chasers so delay is evidenced rather than asserted.

PHSO has two main routes that consumers often confuse.

For NHS services in England, you can approach PHSO after the local complaint process. For complaints about UK government departments and certain public organisations under the parliamentary jurisdiction, the complaint normally has to be referred through an MP.