Guide · Complaints & Disputes

Remedies & redress

Practical action, correction, apology, financial awards and the distinction between putting things right and punishing a firm.

Redress should put right the consequences of what went wrong; the correct remedy depends on the finding, not on a standard compensation figure.

A complaint can need more than money. Redress may involve correcting a credit file, refunding a charge, rewriting a balance, performing a service, issuing documents, apologising, changing a decision or compensating for financial loss and distress/inconvenience.

Start by asking: if the failure had not happened, what position would I probably be in? Then identify any additional non-financial impact.

Key points

  • Separate corrective action from financial compensation.
  • Quantify actual loss with evidence where possible.
  • Explain causation: how did the failure cause the loss?
  • Compare the proposed remedy with the organisation’s own findings.

Types of remedy

CorrectionAmend data, account status, record or decision
Restitution/refundReturn money wrongly charged or paid
PerformanceDo or redo the promised service
Consequential lossReimburse evidenced loss caused by the failure
Distress/inconvenienceRecognise non-financial impact where the scheme permits
InterestCompensate for being kept out of money where appropriate

A remedy can be internally inconsistent

If a decision finds a balance was wrongly pursued but leaves that balance payable, or finds inaccurate data but does not order correction, ask whether the remedy actually resolves the finding.

Compare counterfactual positions

Where an organisation had already offered a better financial position than the later outcome, compare the two. A dispute-resolution process should be able to explain why the ultimate redress is significantly less favourable if the underlying findings support relief.

In practice

  • Create a remedy schedule: issue / finding / consequence / requested action / amount.
  • Provide receipts or calculations for financial loss.
  • Do not inflate claims; precise and proportionate remedies are more credible.

Evidence worth keeping

Findings or failings already accepted
Evidence of direct financial loss
Evidence of inconvenience, distress or lost opportunity where relevant
Any correction/re-performance still needed
Previous offers/remedies
The outcome needed to put you as close as possible to the proper position

Make the remedy auditable.

Useful wording.

“For issue 1 I seek [remedy] because [basis]. For issue 2 I seek [remedy]. My financial calculation is attached. If you consider any requested remedy outside your powers, please state that expressly and identify what remedy you can provide for the upheld failure.”

Ask for a fallback remedy where the primary remedy may be impossible.

If you want repair but the product is no longer available, identify the alternative remedy the statutory scheme permits. If you want a decision reconsidered but the ombudsman cannot substitute its own decision, ask for a fresh lawful process or recommendation within its powers.

Separate putting things right from compensating impact.

Remedy typeExample
Restitution/correctionRefund wrongly charged £80; correct balance.
PerformanceComplete repair or repeat service.
Data/record remedyCorrect inaccurate account or credit entry.
Procedural remedyFresh review by a different decision-maker.
Financial redressReimburse loss; award reasonable inconvenience compensation.
Systemic recommendationChange process/training where the body has that power.

A good complaint asks for remedies the decision-maker can actually order.

Corrective action can include refund, credit, repair, replacement, repeat service, record correction, removal of an invalid charge, apology, explanation, policy/process change, compensation or a fresh decision. The available remedy depends on the law and the powers of the complaint body.